Tim Pawlenty and I have a wide philosophical and political gulf between us.  When he opposed light rail as a legislator, I favored it.  I felt it was inappropriate for anyone running for office to take a “no new taxes” pledge because it left them in an inflexible position, thought that it was a mistake to veto a badly needed Transportation Bill in 2007, and so on. 

      That said, Tim Pawlenty is heads and shoulders above any of the other prospective candidates being put forward as possible McCain Vice-Presidential choices.  Not only does his youth offset Mcain’s long in the tooth appearance, but Pawlenty is intelligent, smooth, articulate, has a lovely and presentable family, and brings evangelical credentials which McCain sorely needs.  In addition, he can probably cut into Obama’s Minnesota vote, looking at it realistically.

     If there was any doubt as to how far Pawlenty has come, one only had to listen to his presentation before the National Press Club last week.  He gave an excellent and flawless presentation, was fully prepared to field questions after the speech, quick on his feet and with a sense of humor.  Pawlenty has positioned himself well, and while we’re still not on the same page with regard to our beliefs, McCain can only be enhanced by choosing the Minnesota Governor for his team.

JOHN EDWARDS

     The angst which John Edwards, and unfortunately his family as well, are enduring, is a personal tragedy.  He is not the first, nor will he  be the last, public figure to be tarred with the stigma of infidelity.  We can run down the list of politicians, from Clinton to McCain, from Eisenhower to Kennedy, from Guiliani to Nelson Rockefeller to Spitzer, and find the tawdry, the unfaithfulness, the scandalous rumors.  But then there are the lies, and the lies are harder to swallow.  If you lied about one thing, would you hesitate to lie about another?  About your principles?  You ideals?  Your vision for the future?  What about consideration for the political party whose nomination you sought?  Knowing what he knew, and what was on the verge of being disclosed, how could he have possibly continued to seek the nomination?  Didn’t he give a whit about the beliefs and faith of his followers in him and what he espoused?  That’s the unconscionable part, not the affair.

     Elizabeth Edwards has endured much over these last few years, and to all outward appearances, she deserved better.  We  never know what really goes on inside a relationship, but Mrs. Edwards, who has battled cancer so valiantly, and the Edwards children, who apparently idolized their father, are surely victims.  But they should be left alone to deal with their problem, and not be plastered on the front pages or the scandal sheets, or the intrusions of so many TV shows which thrive on this type of personal misery.  On the other hand, she apparently knew of this “relationship” since 2006.  How could she allow this falsehood to be perpetrated on the country, if in fact she did know?  Where is the good faith on the part of the Edwards’?  There is none. 

     John Edwards is yet another idol with clay feet.  It doesn’t make the ideals he espoused any less important, nor does it take away from the good he accomplished, but it tarnishes the man, and his image.  Saying he was narcissistic and self-centered is not nearly enough.  He owes his supporters, myself included, and those who put their faith in him, more.  Much more.  That is the least he can do before he slinks into the past.

     But enough about the Bush Administration….

      Chutzpah, for those living in a glass bubble, is described as a brazen or galling statement.  So when I heard McCain’s challenge to Obama today, after he accused Obama of giving up on the energy bill, to “come back into town and come back to work,”  I was speechless (which is not easy for me).  McCain, talking about going back to work?  McCain, who doesn’t like to work weekends?  McCain, who had the worst attendance record in Congress this past session (even worse than Sen. Tim Johnson who was recovering from a brain tumor)?  McCain, who spouts his support of veteran’s and voted nine times to oppose relief for veterans and couldn’t even bother to show up to vote on the Veteran’s Bill of Rights (which he chose not to sign on to as an endorser)?  McCain, who talks about solutions to the energy crisis, and was AWOL, as usual, on the votes on renewable energy and the vote to roll back the uuconscionable tax breaks for big oil (who happen to be big McC contributors)?  McCain, who missed vote after vote?  Gimme a break!

     Entertainer Bernie Mac and Academy Award winner Morgan Freeman were both injured over the weekend in separate incidents.  So explain to me, if you can,  why Google’s headline was “Obama Backers Bernie Mac and Morgan Freeman both Hospitalized”.  What the hell does the fact that they are allegedly Obama backers have to do with anything?  Is it relevant to the story? No.  Was Obama even remotely involved with either incident?  No.  But both injured men are black, and I see this as just another yellow journalism example of playing the race card, in a surreptitious way, by injecting it into a story where it is completely irrelevant.  If it’s not, I’d love to have Google explain it to me.

     Now let’s see if I’ve got this straight…”I do like his (Franken’s) politics” but you’re “very concerned about what Minnesotans are telling me” about the Franken campaign.  So you’re challenging him to make the real battle — against Norm Coleman — easier.  And if the Captain of the Titanic instructed the helmsman to plow straight into the iceberg that probably would have made things easier, too.  Collosal chutzpah, ma’am.

     So you’re raising $1.5 to $2 million to run against Franken in the same vein.  How about if you had volunteered for the campaign he’s been running for several years, to give some of this vaunted advice — because I’m sure that serving on the Sunfish Lake City Council led you to face the same caliber of problems that this nation is facing — and donated those millions to helping him fight the good fight, the real fight?

     When you speak of having “heard from a lot of Democrats” about running, I’m sure that those people, undoubtedly friends and well-wishers (I certainly never received an inquiry about your campaign, nor have “a lot of Democrats that I know”) conducted the same scientific polls that national polling organizations have run to determine the closeness of the Franken-Coleman campaign, to lead to your  conclusion. 

     While you’ve been sitting in your cushy law office for the past several years, Franken happened to be visiting Iraq and Afghanistan, putting his life on the line, with the sole motive of entertaining our brave troops, but I suppose the danger of an angry client telephone call equates with that.  No?  By the way, what is your position on the war?  For that matter, on anything?  Do you have a position, have you studied the issues, have you written articles, have you appeared before groups in support of…anything political over the last half dozen years?  Even a zoning variance?

     And when Al Franken was raising money to supply troops with equipment that the Bush Administration failed to give them before sending them into harm’s way, where were you?  Were you aboard that train?  Did you contribute, since you seem able to raise multi-millions for your own belated effort to enter the primary, what have you offered in support of our men and women in battle? 

     I am a firm believer in the primary process — but for people who are not self-aggrandizing narcissists, and who have subjected them to the political process.  Franken has visited every county in the state in the last several years.  How many have you visited?  Franken has supped at so many chicken dinners to help raise money for Minnesota candidates, that his close advisers were afraid he’d grow feathers.  And you?  There were people who walked the streets and put their names forward before the caucuses, then went to local conventions and the state convention.  And you?  You were probably home supping on pate, and figuring how to throw harpoons.  Have you even canvassed and knocked on the doors of your well-heeled Sunfish Lake community?

     Al Franken has worked hard, not only campaigning, but on his Air America radio show (did you ever listen?  ever call in?) to solidify his positions which are now well known.  And he’s straight forward with what he stands for.  And you?  No, I found your words disingenuous and your campaign engendered by the basest of motivations, i.e., I’ve come not to praise Franken, but to bury him.  You are shameless.

     Lest you think I am a Franken syncophant, I never endorsed him before the State convention (that’s where the party activists, loyalists and workers go to select their candidates, in case you didn’t know), and spent many years in politics (in another state) learning the importance of loyalty to one’s party.  Do I always vote a straight line?  No.  But I don’t sit on the sidelines until the game is almost over, and try to get credit for what the team has done.  That’s much more the tactics of “W” and McCain…and you.

     I see from your Findlaw profile that one of the things you do is specialize in animal bites.  Jackal, anyone?

      We have had nothing from the Bush Administration for seven and a half years except secrets and lies.  They lied us into war, went after the wrong “evil-doers”, are responsible for tens of thousands of deaths, have destroyed our economy, diminished our standing in the world,  favored the top one per cent to the detriment of the other 99, emasculated the Bill of Rights at every turn, tried to destroy the concept and intent of the Constitution and turn us into an Executive Branch of government only; I can go on and on.  Unfortunately, John McCain dances to the same drummer.  If we’re going to save this nation, there is only one vote in November — Obama.

     A month ago, I wrote in this space about tactics used against Al Franken, — derogatory mischaracterizations, downright lies, innuendo, and all the tactics  we have come to associate with desperate right-wing zealots, abhorrent to fair play and decency, to say nothing of responsible campaigning.  I suppose it’s a compliment to Franken — who has amazingly been able to react with statesmanlike dignity in the face of this sleaze — that Norm Coleman’s devotees have had to stoop this low.  Clearly, they are afraid of Franken, afraid that when he gets to Washington he will be a voice against the corporate abuses, the health care fiasco and the pharmaceutical swindles which are merely a few of the multitude of reasons that this country has spiraled downward under the reign of King George.

     It’s a shield of 527s — that corporate tax loophole which candidates can hide behind and which enables them to say, “Oh, that’s not my campaign.  Those are independent organizations over which I have no control.”  Really?  Well, Obama spoke out and said he’ll have none of the falsity, and any responsible candidate can do the same.  It’s not enough to say, “I’m not responsible,” but it’s incumbent on the Colemans of the ballot to speak up, disclaim, apologize for the conduct of their followers, and insist — in fact, demand — that it cease and desist.  Short of that, the candidate is no better than the mud slingers and liars.  That’s been the tactic which the coward Karl Rove has employed in his shameful career, and then, when the rubber hits the road, hides behind the skirts of his benefactors.

     The latest attack on Al Franken, which was vetted yesterday on the non-partisan “Reality Check” by Pat Kessler of WCCO-TV, was the blatant lie that Franken is anti-union, and opposed to secret ballot voting in union organizing efforts.  In a hit piece by a coalition of national business groups who are actually opposed to the Employee Free Choice Act because it increases employee’s rights, these sleazoids put together a piece mirroring “The Sopranos” ganster serial, portraying Franken as a friend of the business interests and opposed to the rights of workers.  Kessler correctly labeled the piece as containing “distorted stereotypes,” “misrepresenting the legislation,” and outright “False.”  The legislation supported by Franken does not eliminate the secret ballot, but in fact makes it easier to organize.

     Al Franken has the support of almost any union you can name — from the AFL-CIO, AFSCME, SEIU, US Steelworkers, Education Minnesota, IBEW, the Teamsters, the UAW, virtually two dozen of the most influential unions, including, interestingly, the St. Paul Firefighters from the city which Coleman formerly governed.  These organizations are not going to endorse someone who opposes their best interests.  On the other hand, hundreds of thousands of dollars have found their way into Coleman’s coffers from corporate, financial, health care and pharmaceutical interests, the same family of organizations which created the false, misleading and reprehensible commercial still airing on television, and taking full page ads in newspapers to put forth the same distorted lies.

      If Norm Coleman does not step forward and disclaim these ads, and these tactics, and insist that we return to discussing the issues, truthfully, then he is no better than the purveyors of malicious falsehoods.

   Â

     I wonder how much valuable newspaper and media space and time is wasted on meaningless, salacious and sensational trivia, such as:

     A-Rod & Madonna — Are they or aren’t they?  Who gives a damn?

    Christy Brinkley — and her divorce (number 2,3,4 or whatever).  Does it affect our lives?  What about health care, honest government, etc.?

    Brangelina twins — Good luck to them both.  Those kids will want for nothing;  my heart goes out to the mother in some third world country who doesn’t know where her next meal is coming from and has twins…or the mother in Darfur who worries if the Janjuweed will use her offspring for bayonet practice.

     Jesse Ventura — wasn’t anything when he allegedly was something.  Run?  Not running?  Why doesn’t he just run…away?

     Since they put a muzzle on John McCain to control that famous temper, he is no more than George Bush without personality, a tired old man who fires from the lip, and who can change positions without blinking an eye.  Every time he opens his mouth, with his insincere platitudes, he offers additional proof that what this nation doesn’t need for the next four years is more of the same — a continuance of the last seven years which has damaged this country in so many ways that it will take decades to mend.  For instance:

     *  McCain, who supported W. in going into the “war” which has long since become an “occupation,” still mouths words about the necessity to win the “war” and achieve “victory,” using the fear mongering “terrorist”  words.  Is there anyone left who believes this garbage, in a situation which we can’t “win,” and where the Iraqis have even come forward with their desire to have us “out.”

     *  Old John claims that he will balance the budget by 2013, albeit that every responsible economist states that this is virtually impossible, with the nation mired in billions in debt, and continuing to pour about $12 billion a month into Iraq, at the same time that Al Queda has now reconstituted in Afghanistan and continues to grow as a threat.

     *  McCain insists that he would continue, and even increase, the Bush “tax cuts” while accusing Obama of planning to raise taxes, despite the proof to the contrary.  Obama would roll back the tax breaks to the wealthiest 5% of the population, long overdue, which would do no more than start to balance the playing field, which is tilted so far against the middle class wage earners — job losses, foreclosures, spiraling gas prices to benefit the Bush cronies — that they are threatened with sliding into oblivion.  Of course McCain, with his seven homes and heiress second wife, can’t even begin to fathom the burden that most of the nation faces.  He’s completely out of touch.

     *  He claims that government spending “is out of control,”  and has escalated beyond control over the last eight years.  Well, since Bush and the GOP controlled the Executive and the Legislative branches of government during six of those years, when the escation was born, where was McCain, the longtime Senator, to speak up, to rein in, to be a voice for moderation?  He was AWOL.

     *  He also complains about the fact that government has grown during that same period to the largest size in history.  Same story.  Who was at the rudder?  And where was John?  AWOL, and without any voice as Departments were created, and engourged with incompetents.

     *  You would think, with his background, that he would have at least supported the G.I. Bill of Rights.  But he didn’t (although W. praised him at the signing), and wasn’t even present for the vote.

     *   Speaking of being present, and attendance, who has the worst attendance record in the Senate, having missed more sessions than even Tim Johnson, who was recovering from a stroke?  Why, it was John McCain!  He hadn’t even answered “present” from mid-April until July, when some very serious legislation was debated and voted upon.

     *  Supportive of the Bush agenda practically right down the line, where is his voice as the administration threatens Medicare cuts that will damage the elderly and the middle class?  AWOL, when even the AMA is crying out in protest.

     *  The FISA debate?  Is there any doubt where he will vote — if in fact he does vote — when this important bill comes up, a bill which authorizes even further government spying, which tramples on the safeguards of the Constitution, which would give immunity to the phone companies and their executives who knuckled under to illegal demands and became conspirators in this travesty?  The FISA bill goes beyond George Orwell’s wildest fantasies.  You know where McCain will be, and he’ll be standing against the Constitution.

     *  Judges — McCain has already stated that he will have a litmus test for the appointment of Judges, particularly Supreme Court Judges, and will look for strict right-wing devotees in the mode of Scalia, Alito, Roberts and Thomas, which would not only terminate the decades old freedom of choice provisions for women, but would “judically legislate” a move back towards the Middle Ages and end the progress that this nation has enjoyed since the New Deal.  As it is, there has been serious erosion on that progress, and a McCain appointment to the Supreme Court would cement that erosion.  This reason alone, without more, is why not only Democrats, but also Libertarians and Independents, as well as Constitutional scholars, recognize the necessity of opposing John McCain.

     *  Responsibility — The McCains failed to pay real estate taxes on at least one of their seven homes (mansions?) for a period of over four years.  If you or I did that, we would find ourselves in foreclosure.  Is that the type of responsibility we want controlling the purse strings of our nation, when those purse strings are already frayed to the point of breaking?

     You pick the topic, then look at McCain’s positions, or fluctuations, and there is no question that he is not competent to lead this nation.

Next »